[WSMDiscuss] Mining conflicts multiply, as critics of ‘extractivism’ gather in Johannesburg
Patrick Bond
pbond at mail.ngo.za
Sat Nov 10 20:14:20 CET 2018
(If you're near Joburg, this tribunal against TNCs underway now -
including tomorrow - is excellent. And be sure to come for the opening
plenary on Monday which will turn into a protest against AngloGold
Ashanti next door, in the mining precinct of Newtown.)
https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/mining-conflicts-multiply-as-critics-of-extractivism-gather-in-johannesburg/
*Mining conflicts multiply, as critics of ‘extractivism’ gather in
Johannesburg *
By Patrick Bond
The World Social Forum’s ‘Thematic Forum on Mining and Extractivism
<https://www.thematicsocialforum.org/>’ convenes from November 12-15
here in Johannesburg, just after the Southern Africa People’s Tribunal
on Transnational Corporations
<http://aidc.org.za/3rd-session-peoples-permanent-tribunal/>. In
between, at the notorious 2012 massacre site on the platinum belt to the
west, there’s a launch of a new book – /Business as Usual after Marikana
<http://www.jacana.co.za/book-categories/new-releases-65840/business-as-usual-after-marikana-detail>
/– critical not only of the mining house Lonmin but of its international
financiers and buyers.
This is the moment for a profoundly critical standpoint to take root,
unhindered by ineffectual reformism associated with Corporate Social
Responsibility
<https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317906599/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315848341-18>
gimmicks and the mining sector’s civilised-society watchdogging at the
mainly uncritical
<https://www.pambazuka.org/global-south/we-need-real-%E2%80%9Calternatives-mining%E2%80%9D-indaba>
Alternative Mining Indaba. That NGO-dominated event occurs annually in
Cape Town every February, at the same time and place where the
extractive mega-corporations gather.
The Thematic Forum firmly opposes <https://www.thematicsocialforum.org/>
‘extractivism.’ Unlike the Indaba
<https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/13/disconnecting-the-minerals-energy-climate-dots/>,
it aims to connect the dots between oppressions, defining its target as
extraction of “so-called natural resources” in a way that is
“devastating and degrading,” since mining exacerbates “conditions of
global warming and climate injustice. It subjects local economies to a
logic of accumulation that privately benefits corporations,” and
represses “traditional, indigenous and peasant communities by violations
of human rights, affecting in particular the lives of women and children.”
The last point is not incidental, as two of the main organisers are the
Southern Africa Rural Women's Assembly
<https://www.facebook.com/SARuralWomen/?fref=mentions&__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARD2VrKCXK7yqD6rKMom_LW-6VGnCS9Imhl70G2O_nUmjBvNx6LR_TsMqsq8kkxd_sGdBOX-kXp0H6kcjoQMvp1ZhvT3CmkqXD_ohBwVANwOrcoEdqRRWRBJzU-ZU9Ycc2uKiNZykrD8yrsRV_i4qc7pcMUSw8e940KT8T054yK95L_jUsPTYi5ajei5E7KdGXaR9TKsoS7a-eCIRN0NpSs-Mwc&__tn__=K-R>
and the WoMin <https://womin.org.za/> network: “African Women Unite
Against Destructive Resource Extraction.” Inspired by Amadiba Crisis
Committee activists in the Eastern Cape’s Wild Coast, they’ve campaigned
hard for the _#Right2SayNo
<https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/right2sayno?source=feed_text&__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARD2VrKCXK7yqD6rKMom_LW-6VGnCS9Imhl70G2O_nUmjBvNx6LR_TsMqsq8kkxd_sGdBOX-kXp0H6kcjoQMvp1ZhvT3CmkqXD_ohBwVANwOrcoEdqRRWRBJzU-ZU9Ycc2uKiNZykrD8yrsRV_i4qc7pcMUSw8e940KT8T054yK95L_jUsPTYi5ajei5E7KdGXaR9TKsoS7a-eCIRN0NpSs-Mwc&__tn__=%2ANK-R>_.
Last month, such rights language proved invaluable in the Constitutional
Court here in Johannesburg, when the Itireleng community won
<https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2018-11-01-maledu-judgment-victory-for-the-constitution-over-mining-evictions/>
a judgement <http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2018/41.html> against
displacement from their farm, under attack by a local platinum mining
house. (This was pleasantly surprising to many of us who are Court
critics, given how much corporate power
<https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Corporate+rights+in+South+Africa.-a019528162>
is hardwired into South Africa’s founding document.)
On the Wild Coast last month, South Africa’s Mining Minister Gwede
Mantashe
<https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2018-09-27-from-xolobeni-to-the-mining-charter-community-members-marginalised/>
had shown how desperately he wants investment by the likes of aggressive
Australian titanium mining firm MRC
<https://www.moneyweb.co.za/mineweb/mining-companies-investment/awkward-questions-get-short-shrift-at-mrc-annual-general-meeting/>.
But the Amadiba Crisis Committee
<https://www.facebook.com/amadibacrisiscommittee/> and its allies have
consistently shown their ability to say “No!”
*No means no*
The Forum’s opening morning features a demonstration at the nearby world
headquarters of AngloGold Ashanti, the locally-listed firm shamed in
2005 by Human Rights Watch
<https://www.hrw.org/report/2005/06/01/curse-gold> for its alliances
with warlords during the minerals-related murder of millions of people
in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. In 2011, AngloGold
Ashanti won the title “world’s most irresponsible corporation” at the
‘Davos Public Eye’ ceremony
<https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=202199>
organised outside the World Economic Forum by Greenpeace and the Berne
Declaration.
Since then the firm has attracted even more intense community, labour,
feminist and environmental protests from Chile
<http://ejatlas.org/conflict/mina-cerro-vanguardia> to Colombia
<https://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/2018/03/27/how-a-tiny-colombian-village-beat-the-worlds-third-largest-gold-mining-company/>
to Ghana
<http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2017/mar/30/profiteering-mars-record-black-african-gold-mining/>
to Guinea
<http://www.miningweekly.com/article/anglogold-ashantis-guinea-mine-hit-by-violent-power-cuts-protests-2018-06-28>
to Tanzania <https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/1/1/3/htm>, as well as at
home in South Africa
<https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-06-29-miners-rise-up-and-march-as-anglo-gold-ashanti-fires-salvo-to-cut-8500-jobs/>
over mass retrenchments, inadequate pay and delay of silicosis-related
compensation payments. It’s a sick company, with its Johannesburg Stock
Exchange price having fallen by more than half since a mid-2016 peak
(and even further from its 2006-12 JSE valuations).
Criticised
<https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/companies/mining/2018-07-23-anglogold-ashanti-appoints-barricks-kelvin-dushnisky-as-ceo/>
by investors who believe “AngloGold has not matched up to its global
peers” in large part because of less profitable South African holdings,
AngloGold Ashanti is rapidly exiting its home country. The firm
<https://books.google.co.za/books/about/Anglo_American_and_the_rise_of_modern_So.html?id=cYhkAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y>
made its fortune during the notorious 20^th century era of extreme
apartheid extractivism when it was run by the Oppenheimer family.
Perhaps even worse is the new boss, Kelvin Dushnisky
<https://tanzaniabusinessethics.wordpress.com/2018/09/13/kelvin-dushnisky-accountable-for-crimes-violations-human-rights-abuses-damages/>,
who has presided over Toronto-based Barrick (the world's largest gold
producer, known in Africa as Acacia) during its recent reign of mining
terrorism <http://protestbarrick.net/>, including mass rape
<http://protestbarrick.net/article.php@id=1007.html>.
The mining corporations under fire at the Forum are not only the typical
pinstriped, ethics-challenged cowboys from the
London-Toronto-Melbourne-Joburg circuits. Next door in Mozambique,
Rio-based Vale’s coal-mining operations at Moatize were disrupted last
month, according
<https://clubofmozambique.com/news/vale-mozambique-suspends-activities-in-moatize-after-protests-watch/>
to activist allies at the Associação de Apoio e Assistência Jurídica às
Comunidades, due to “excessive pollution [and] acceleration of the decay
of houses due to explosion of dynamites.”
Albeit trying to “mask brutal exploitation with the language of
South-South solidarity,” as documented
<https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/11/vale-corporation-brazil-mining-lula-mozambique-brics>
by Canadian researcher Judith Marshall, Vale is brutal in numerous
jurisdictions, judged by Berne Declaration and the Brazilian Movement of
Landless Workers as worst company in the world
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2012/01/30/worst-company-in-the-world-award-goes-to/#76f601d76a0a>
in 2012 due to “its labour relations, community impact and environmental
record.”
In Mozambique, Vale as well as the Indian firms Coal of India, Vedanta
and Jindal have been criticised for displacement and destruction.
Community protests
<https://clubofmozambique.com/news/mzoambique-coal-and-resettlement-by-joseph-hanlon/>
against foreign companies are prolific in coal-rich Tete Province.
Further east, on the Mozambican coastline, beach sands in some
communities have been destroyed by the voracious Chinese firm Haiyu.
Complains
<https://mg.co.za/article/2018-10-16-they-have-taken-our-beautiful-sand-from-us-and-left-nothing>
a local resident who can no longer carry out fishing subsistence,
Nassire Omar, “They owe us because they have taken our beautiful sand
from us and left nothing. We don’t know the quantity of the sand that
they took over seven years, but we know that they profited from it and
we want our dues. They have taken all the riches here and left us with
nothing.”
But it may be that Vedanta <http://www.foilvedanta.org/> and its boss
Anil Agarwal – who is also Anglo American Corporation’s largest single
investor with more than 20% of shares – has witnessed the most sustained
protest, including a mass protest in May against the ThoothukudiSterlite
copper plant which his officials responded to with a massacre of 13
Indians demanding an end to pollution.
Protest against Africa’s largest copper mine, Konkola, centres on 1,826
Zambian farmers
<http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/158040/emlungowe-v-vedantaem-appeal-highlights-important-points-regarding-parent-company-liability>
poisoned by Vedanta. Just before the London Stock Exchange delisting of
Vedanta last month, popular reggae musician Maiko Zulu protested
<https://www.lusakatimes.com/2018/09/28/maiko-zulu-released-after-kcm-protest/>
(and was arrested) at the British High Commission in Lusaka, demanding
that authorities deny Agarwal his escape from London prior to justice
being served. Agarwal bought <http://www.foilvedanta.org/?s=Konkola>
that mine for $25 million in 2004 and a decade later bragged
<https://www.lusakaftimes.com/2014/05/13/video-vedanta-boss-saying-kcm-makes-500-million-profit-per-year/>
that ever since he had taken $500 million to $1 billion home from
Konkola /annually./
Maiko Zulu just before arrest at British High Commission, Lusaka, 27
September 2018
*After extractivism*
These sorts of Western+BRICS modes of super-exploitation exemplify the
mineral, oil and gas looting
<https://www.pambazuka.org/economics/new-evidence-africa%E2%80%99s-systematic-looting-provided-increasingly-schizophrenic-world-bank>
underway across Africa. The uncompensated extraction of non-renewable
resources amounts to an estimated $150 billion annually, far more even
than the $50-80 billion Illicit Financial Flows and $50 billion in legal
profit repatriation from Africa by mining and petroleum firms.
But increasingly, mining houses are pushing the people and environment
too far, and resistance is rising. As Anglo American Corporation leader
Mark Cutifani remarked
<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-17/miners-offer-clinics-bull-rings-as-protests-tie-up-25-billion>
in 2015, “There’s something like $25 billion worth of projects tied up
or stopped” by mining critics across the world.
How activists can increase that figure is the topic of next week’s
discussions, along with moving from these critiques to strategies for
post-extractivist systems of political economy, political ecology and
social reproduction.
(Patrick Bond – pbond at mail.ngo.za <mailto:pbond at mail.ngo.za> – teaches
political economy at the Wits University School of Governance in
Johannesburg.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openspaceforum.net/pipermail/wsm-discuss/attachments/20181110/8144650e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ipjgcgefnaahmbll.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 76594 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.openspaceforum.net/pipermail/wsm-discuss/attachments/20181110/8144650e/attachment.jpg>
More information about the WSM-Discuss
mailing list