[WSMDiscuss] China passes controversial Hong Kong national security law (Lily Kuo in Beijing, and Verna Yu in Hong Kong, June 30 2020) / Dozens arrested during Hong Kong peaceful protest against national security laws (June 29 2020)

Jai Sen jai.sen at cacim.net
Tue Jun 30 04:22:00 CEST 2020

Monday, June 29, 2020

Hong Kong in movement…, China in movement…, Freedoms in movement…, Resistance in movement…

[The die is finally cast.  China has played its hand.  The only thing surprising about this report is only that the journalists keep saying things like “Critics say the measure, which criminalises secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces, erodes Hong Kong’s autonomy”.  Of course it does – that’s the whole point !  What the Chinese state will do next is clear; the only question now is how the resistance in Hong Kong will respond…

[A report from the day before, also, further on down below :


China passes controversial Hong Kong national security law – first reports

Critics say the measure, which criminalises secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces, erodes Hong Kong’s autonomy

Lily Kuo <https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lily-kuo> in Beijing, and Verna Yu <https://www.theguardian.com/profile/verna-yu> in Hong Kong, June 30 2020

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/30/china-passes-controversial-hong-kong-national-security-law?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/30/china-passes-controversial-hong-kong-national-security-law?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other>

Human rights activists fear China’s national security law will further threaten the freedoms enjoyed in Hong Kong  (Photograph: Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty Images)

Beijing has reportedly passed a sweeping national security law <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/21/hong-kongs-security-laws-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-so-controversial> for Hong Kong that critics fear will crush political freedoms and pave the way for China to cement its control over the semi-autonomous territory.

Less than 40 days after Chinese lawmakers first proposed imposing an anti-sedition law on Hong Kong, the standing committee of the National People’s Congress, on Tuesday approved the measure, criminalising secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. Several Hong Kong media organisations, citing unnamed sources, reported the law was passed unanimously by the committee.

The law, which has been condemned internationally, deals a devastating blow to Hong Kong’s autonomy as promised under the “one country two systems” framework, the terms of the former British colony’s handover to Chinese control in 1997.

In the decades since, Hong Kong’s free press, independent courts and legislature, as well as its traditions of protests and marches have made the city a haven for the civil liberties not enjoyed across the border in mainland China, especially as the government under Xi Jinping has further cracked down on civil society.

Those differences were thrown into sharp relief last year as protests - over another controversial bill that residents saw as further Chinese encroachment on their city – turned into a broader democracy movement. Authorities have been clear that the legislation is aimed at stopping those protests, which have created new diplomatic tensions and added to an increasingly hostile international environment for Beijing.

Beijing has accused the US and other foreign “black hands” of inciting the demonstrations as a way to destabilise China. The US said on Monday it would stop exporting sensitive military items to Hong Kong, as it moved to revoke the city’s special trade status as separate from China in retaliation for the looming national security law. The US has also said it would limit visas for current and former Chinese officials <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/27/us-restricts-visas-for-chinese-officials-over-hong-kong-freedoms> believed “responsible for, or complicit in, undermining Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy”.

Legal scholars and critical residents say the law effectively destroys one country, two systems, a firewall between Hong Kong and China, meant to preserve the city’s “high degree of autonomy” for 50 years after the handover. Beijing has defended the measure by calling other countries hypocritical when criticising China for moving to defend its own national security.

While broadly condemned in mainland China where state media routinely describe the protesters as violent “rioters” and “terrorists,” a minority of Chinese activists and residents have been punished <https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/travel-06262020120218.html> for supporting the protests in Hong Kong.

According to detail released previously, the law will see Beijing set up a national security agency in Hong Kong to “guide” the territory’s implementation of the law. It will also have jurisdiction over cases in “certain circumstances”. Should discrepancies arise, the security legislation will override Hong Kong law. The law promises to protect the civic rights of Hong Kong residents.

Jerome Cohen, an expert in Chinese law at New York University has called such language “eye candy”. “The very provisions in the draft national security law would appear to violate the protections offered by Hong Kong law and the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights),” he said referring to the key international human rights treaty to which Hong Kong is a signatory.

Legal scholars also take issue with how the law was passed – through a legal manoeuvre that bypasses the Hong Kong’s own legislature and the possibility of public dissent stopping the bill. A previous attempt to pass a national security law, by pro-Beijing lawmakers and the government, caused mass protests and was shelved. A full draft of the law, to be enacted immediately, was not made public before its passage on Tuesday.

Officials have promised the law will only target a “narrow set” of behaviours but rights advocates and observers believe it will be used broadly to stifle dissent.

“An axiom of criminal law in systems that respect rights is that offences should be precisely drawn. When not, they are open to the discretion and abuse of those who will bring the charges. They have been used precisely this way in China,” said Martin S Flaherty, a visiting law professor at Princeton University who has specialised in China human rights.

He said the special detention centres for suspects in national security cases could “become fora for torture, abusive interrogation, and coerced confessions.”

Prominent activists believe they are likely to be arrested within days after the law’s enactment. In the past year, police have arrested more than 9,000 protesters, including pro-democracy lawmakers and activists who have frequently lobbied to bring international attention to Hong Kong’s cause.

Still, experts believe the measure is likely to solidify resistance in Hong Kong over the long term, raising the possibility of yet more instability. 

Dozens arrested during Hong Kong peaceful protest against national security laws

Silent protest ends in scuffles with police as Beijing prepares to approve controversial legislation

Reuters, June 29 2020

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/29/dozens-arrested-during-hong-kong-peaceful-protest-against-national-security-laws?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/29/dozens-arrested-during-hong-kong-peaceful-protest-against-national-security-laws?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other>
Hong Kong police have arrested at least 53 people after scuffles erupted during a relatively peaceful protest against planned national security legislation <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/28/china-vote-npc-national-security-laws-hong-kong-us-protest> to be implemented by the mainland Chinese government.

Armed riot police were present as a crowd of several hundred moved from Jordan to Mong Kok in the Kowloon district on Sunday, staging what was intended as a “silent protest” against the planned law.

Later scuffles broke out in Mong Kok, prompting police to use pepper spray to subdue parts of the crowd. Hong Kong Police said on Facebook that 53 people had been arrested and charged with unlawful assembly, adding that earlier some protesters tried to blockade roads in the area.

The proposed national security law has raised concerns among Hong Kong democracy activists and some foreign governments that Beijing is further eroding the extensive autonomy promised when Britain handed the territory back to China in 1997.

“The governments wants to shut us up and to kick us out,” one protester, Roy Chan, 44, said. “We must stand up and strike down all those people who deprive Hong Kong people’s freedom.”

Sunday’s event came a day after Hong Kong police refused permission for an annual march usually held on 1 July to mark the 1997 handover, citing a ban on large gatherings amid the coronavirus pandemic.

China has said the new security law will target only a small group of troublemakers as it tackles separatism, subversion, terrorism and foreign interference in Hong Kong.

The standing committee of China’s National People’s Congress reviewed a draft of the bill on Sunday.

Chinese state media reported that lawmakers overwhelmingly supported the draft. The Chinese government has “unshakable determination to push ahead with enactment of the security bill and safeguard national sovereignty and interest”, state broadcaster CCTV reported, citing a government spokesperson. 


Jai Sen

Independent researcher, editor; Senior Fellow at the School of International Development and Globalisation Studies at the University of Ottawa

jai.sen at cacim.net <mailto:jai.sen at cacim.net>
Now based in New Delhi, India (+91-98189 11325) and in Ottawa, Canada, on unceded and unsurrendered Anishinaabe territory (+1-613-282 2900) 

CURRENT / RECENT publications :

Jai Sen, ed, 2018a – The Movements of Movements, Part 2 : Rethinking Our Dance. Ebook and hard copy available at PM Press <http://www.pmpress.org/>
Jai Sen, ed, 2018b – The Movements of Movements, Part 1 : What Makes Us Move ? (Indian edition). New Delhi : AuthorsUpfront, in collaboration with OpenWord and PM Press.  Hard copy available at MOM1AmazonIN <https://www.amazon.in/dp/9387280101/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1522884070&sr=8-2&keywords=movements+of+movements+jai+sen>, MOM1Flipkart <https://www.flipkart.com/the-movements-of-movements/p/itmf3zg7h79ecpgj?pid=9789387280106&lid=LSTBOK9789387280106NBA1CH&marketplace=FLIPKART&srno=s_1_1&otracker=search&fm=SEARCH&iid=ff35b702-e6a8-4423-b014-16c84f6f0092.9789387280106.SEARCH&ppt=Search%20Page>, and MOM1AUpFront <http://www.authorsupfront.com/movements.htm>
Jai Sen, ed, 2017 – The Movements of Movements, Part 1 : What Makes Us Move ?.  New Delhi : OpenWord and Oakland, CA : PM Press.  Ebook and hard copy available at PM Press <http://www.pmpress.org/>
SUBSCRIBE TO World Social Movement Discuss, an open, unmoderated, and self-organising forum on social and political movement at any level (local, national, regional, and global).  To subscribe, simply send an empty email to wsm-discuss-subscribe at lists.openspaceforum.net <mailto:wsm-discuss-subscribe at lists.openspaceforum.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openspaceforum.net/pipermail/wsm-discuss/attachments/20200629/3bf63698/attachment.htm>

More information about the WSM-Discuss mailing list