[WSMDiscuss] (Fwd) South Africa - "Cry of the Xcluded's" visionary demands, contrasted with Ramaphosa's depraved, dangerous state - securocrats, non-testing, CT municipality, prisons, SASSA, xenophobes - and increasingly desperate society
Patrick Bond
pbond at mail.ngo.za
Thu May 14 08:06:15 CEST 2020
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-05-13-the-cry-of-the-xcluded-we-want-a-radical-new-deal-that-provides-three-million-jobs/
The Cry of the Xcluded: We want a radical new deal that provides three
million jobs
By Cry of the Xcluded• 13 May 2020
We will emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic into a global economic
crisis and mass unemployment. South Africa was already in an
economic recession before the pandemic. We have had mass
unemployment for years. We have had more than 14 million people
going to bed hungry. Now, everything is set to get worse. A tragedy
of huge proportions is unfolding and only by standing together can
complete catastrophe be averted.
In South Africa, and every other country in the world, a great debate is
underway. What can be done about the looming economic crisis?
One answer is to give vast sums of money to banks, hedge funds, mining
houses, airlines, oil companies and so on – and, while not explicitly
stated, cut public spending on all human needs. This is what’s called a
stimulus package.
A different answer is that we spend vast sums of money to create new
jobs, build a unified health system, meet human needs and stop climate
change.
So who and what do we rescue? Banks and corporations, or people and our
planet?
Our answer is this. We need a just transition to a radical Green New
Deal. Central to that, we want government to hire three million new
workers. To be employed directly, working for central and local
government. Provincial government must be absorbed into local government
to ensure greater capacity.
When must this happen? Now. Because we are suffering right now.
The pandemic has been a searchlight in the dark, picking out every
injustice and inequality in South Africa. It is these inequalities that
show us what needs to be done.
There are so many people living in shacks without enough space, without
clean water, without proper sanitation. They are completely defenceless
in the face of a crisis.
We need to build decent, spacious housing near parks and places of work.
We need clean water, sanitation and sewage lines. And we want to break
the neo-apartheid segregation of the rich and poor. New homes must be
built in the centres of our cities and towns.
There are tremendous opportunities for employing young people in
‘building brigades’, where they can be trained to be the bricklayers,
plumbers and electricians our mass housing programme will need.
Obviously we need a decent health service for all, so that the poor and
people living in rural areas get the same standard of treatment the rich
get now.
Our community health workers have been heroic, and this is a foretaste
of a better future. But they work on a casual and precarious basis. They
must have contracts, permanent jobs and a living wage.
The lockdown has exposed the scale and number of people living hand to
mouth, day to day, in the informal sector. The lockdown saw people go
from being waste-pickers scratching in bins one day, to having no income
the next.
Never again. People need work. So do the over 11 million people who were
jobless before the pandemic. This includes those who have given up
looking for work and those who Stats SA counts as homemakers – mostly women.
Apart from the crisis of unemployment, there is the sheer barbarity of
some, the collapse of our social fabric, the violence against women and
children, the xenophobic attacks. Jobs will not solve all our problems,
but we cannot begin to solve anything while so many are without work.
The lockdown has exposed how millions of South Africans go to bed hungry
every night. This will continue as long as food production remains in
the hands of fewer than 40,000 commercial farmers and four major
supermarket chains.
We need local food production and local food markets supplied by
small-scale farmers who can raise animals and crops in ways that use
traditional knowledge and preserve the soil. It must include the
thousands of farmworkers still living on commercial farms.
This is why we need land redistribution. Many farmworkers face eviction
– they need security of tenure. Two million small-scale farmers need
land and support far more than the new layer of black commercial farmers
who do nothing to break the hold of industrial agriculture.
The unemployed movements are demanding a basic income grant. Government
says all it can afford is a R350 per month disaster-related grant
lasting for six months – enough for an extra loaf of bread a day and
nothing more. We need a grant ten times that amount – as close as
possible to the national minimum wage.
We also need jobs relating to climate change. Jobs that can help stop
global warming. Jobs in the renewable energy and transport sectors. Jobs
that involve rehabilitating land damaged by mining. We have begun to see
what climate change means. The long droughts, the storms, the floods
across southern Africa. And much worse is to come.
Covid-19 has taught us what happens if you ignore the warnings of the
scientists. It has taught us to act first, before the worst comes to
pass. It has taught us that environmental disasters will produce
economic disasters. That we must act together, all over the world, or we
will die separately. And it has again taught us what we already know –
it is the poor countries and the poorest in them who suffer the most.
We have long supported the campaign for One Million Climate Jobs. That
is why we call for a Just Transition to a Green New Deal. These jobs
must include building enough solar and wind farms to meet our energy
needs. We must have jobs manufacturing wind turbines and solar arrays in
South Africa. Otherwise we will only have jobs monitoring and cleaning
wind farms and solar panels. This will need radical changes to our trade
policies.
Workers in fossil fuel industries fear that green energy will cost them
their jobs. It won’t – not if the transition is publicly driven, phased
in and managed in all aspects of the shift. We must be absolutely clear
what a ‘just transition’ means. Anyone who loses a job in the transition
will have a decent, permanent government job in the Green New Deal, or a
lifetime grant based on their current pay, for those unable to take up
suitable alternate jobs.
Covid-19 was not caused by climate change. But it is a small taste of
what will come if humanity does not stop climate change.
Perhaps a million jobs will be provided in renewable energy, transport
and other climate-related work. Perhaps two million will be created to
meet other needs. We can debate this. We hope to bring together working
groups from every sector of society. These groups will draw up plans for
what jobs the three million workers could do. And for what kind of a
society we want.
We have done this before in South Africa, assembling alternative plans
and economic visions of a nation of equals. This is what we fought the
freedom struggle for. We come from a long tradition.
But this is not an alternative economic vision we’d like to see realised
some day. We are proposing a fight for three million new public sector
jobs now. We want government to provide those jobs, or be replaced by a
government that can and will do it. The measure of our success will not
be words, or promises, or come from members of this or that party. The
measure will come when three million people are doing those jobs.
We are now trapped in a minerals, energy and finance-driven economy
focused on export. It’s this economy that built apartheid. It made the
great mining houses rich and created many millionaires. This economy is
now declining at increasing speed. The mining houses grow ever more
desperate for foreign investment to survive. The government grows ever
more focused on finding foreign investment and currency. That money can,
and does, pour out again, leaving us in a financial panic with mounting
debt and fewer jobs. It’s a bankrupted strategy.
We remain, as we have been for more than a century, the playthings and a
source of value for the financial empires of Europe and North America,
and now China too.
We cannot stop this decline without equality in South Africa. We can
only move away from dependence on foreign exchange if our working people
have enough income to buy what we make. We need a steel industry again,
to produce the steel that will be needed for housing and other vital
infrastructure – for wind turbines and a new electricity grid. We need
the long-promised but never delivered integrated public transport system
providing cheap, convenient, regular and safe mobility for everyone. We
need a renewables industry to kickstart many other industries. We need
plants making electric vehicles of every kind, that can run on
electricity from renewable sources.
If there is anything that the Covid-19 lockdown has taught us, it is
that we can change the way we work. We can work remotely. We don’t need
our cars that much. We don’t really need the fossil fuels that our cars
burn. We don’t need planes and trains all that much. What we do need is
greater information and communication technology infrastructure. We need
state-owned ICT that can provide free internet and cost-effective remote
communication to our people. We need free education programmes on the
internet. We need webinars that can teach us and our children without
putting a burden on the planet.
In short, we need a new green industrial sector.
We cannot solve our suffering in South Africa on our own. Were we to
confront the power of global capital alone, we would be helpless.
But the discussions we will have in South Africa will now be had in
every country in the world.
And we need to think of not rescuing airlines so that foreign tourists
can visit. We need to ask instead: When can people from Khayelitsha swim
in the ocean, walk in the mountains, and stand in awe of our wildlife?
How can we pay for this? South Africa is not a poor country. It is a
rich country full of poor people. We have resources on a global scale.
We also have obscenely rich people who care nothing for the majority of
their fellow citizens.
Many economists say that we cannot afford three million new jobs. We
can. All we need to do is tax the incomes and wealth of the rich. Yes,
the details of economic and tax policies are more complicated than that.
But they are also simple. We will need dramatic changes to economic
policies to give us the power to implement our financing plans.
Yet, it is understandable that our economists and ministers worry about
foreign exchange and the rand. They are afraid of the power of the world
economy, and that power is real, implacable and cruel. But there is
another power in the world.
We cannot solve our suffering in South Africa on our own. Were we to
confront the power of global capital alone, we would be helpless. But
the discussions we will have in South Africa will now be had in every
country in the world.
In every country there are people saying, “We are not going back to
normal, because normal was the problem.” We need to meet human needs. We
need jobs and to get the economy moving again. We need to save our
planet. This means we will have to fight the corporate polluters, the
financiers, the big banks. It probably means a fight with our
government, which refuses to break with these elites who brought us to
this point.
Fights for Green New Deals around the world can make us stronger in each
country. In this, lies one of our greatest strengths – that the cry of
the excluded is the cry of the majority of humanity. *DM*
/This piece is published in the name of the Cry of the Xcluded. The
following have pinned their names to it:/
* /Zwelinzima Vavi – SAFTU/
* /Joseph Mathunjwa – AMCU/
* /Nonhle Mbuthuma – Amadiba Crisis Committee/
* /Sbu Zikodi – Abahlali baseMjondolo/
* /Matthew Hlabane – Southern Africa Green Revolutionary Council (SAGRC)/
* /Pinky Langa – SAGRC/
* /Ayanda Kota – Unemployed People’s Movement /
* /Khokhoma Motsi – Botshabelo Unemployed Movement
/
***
South Africa: Be Aware and Beware of The Rise of the Securocrats
By Daily Maverick• 13 May 2020
Giving police, the representatives of the executive arm of state,
the power to make decisions on details of people’s lives is not in
keeping with a constitutional democracy.
Government’s Covid-19 hard lockdown decisions meant a national curfew
and requiring police permits to move house are now part of South
Africa’s constitutional democracy.
It’s a replay of the securocrats’ push in the first regulations for
wholesale indemnity for security services, a measure that’s not
permissible even in the State of Emergency, according to the Constitution.
Then, the constitutionalists in Cabinet ensured the blatantly unlawful
indemnity was deleted from the hard Covid-19 State of Disaster lockdown
regulations.
Now those constitutionalists appear to have fallen silent.
Silent about the curfew that was not deemed necessary at Level 5, but
now will remain in place even in lockdown Level 1. And silent about the
moving house police permit – the first such police-dependent permission,
as all other permissions, like attending funerals or moving children
between parents living separately, are, quite correctly in a
constitutional democracy, in the domain of magistrates.
Giving police, the representatives of the executive arm of state, the
power to make decisions on details of people’s lives is not in keeping
with a constitutional democracy.
It follows the turn to lawmaking by the stroke of ministerial pens –
without public consultation, without the involvement of legislators.
Much of the Covid-19 hard lockdown government decision-making is
informed by NatJoints, or the National Joint Operational and
Intelligence Structure that brings together the SAPS, SA National
Defence Force (SANDF) and State Security. Established by a Cabinet memo
well over a decade ago without basis in legislation, it’s virtually
impervious to oversight or accountability.
NatJoints helped author the first set of Covid-19 lockdown regulations,
including the security services’ indemnity, and it is on public record
from presentations to Parliament that NatJoints continues to daily
monitor the lockdown and draft plans for the National Command Council,
whose decisions NatJoints then “operationalises”, as the lingo of the
police briefing went.
And even if other national government departments may be involved – and
consultations with provincial and local government leaders and
opposition leaders unfolded – the police, military and spooks have a
heightened role in government decision-making. Particularly as at one
stage government decision-making seemed to sidestep Cabinet in favour of
the Covid-19 National Command Council.
The temptation is to shrug this off as what’s often called “middle-class
problems”. But it’s not that. It talks directly to the shaping of South
Africa’s constitutional democracy going forward, far beyond any Covid-19
lockdown.
Because, let’s be blunt, those who find themselves at the sharp point of
bureaucrats’ officious caprices or of police and soldiers’ brutality are
the hungry, and the working poor, not the middle class.
The Covid-19 hard lockdown has shown how police and soldiers may say
they uphold South Africa’s constitutional democracy, but in reality,
fall short.
Sjambokking and forced exercises the police and soldiers have been
publicly caught out on are unlawful and – even in a declared State of
Disaster – unconstitutional. Never mind the assaults and shootings.
And while rights may be limited, not even a State of Emergency changes
the constitutionally guaranteed rights to life, to dignity, and not to
be tortured in any way or to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman
and degrading way.
And it must be re-emphasised that South Africa has declared a State of
Disaster, which in law means /assistance to the public/– relief and
mitigating the destructive effects of the disaster are central.
If stamping of the authority of the state is a desired SAPS
performance outcome it indicates a loss of legitimacy. Seeking to
restore legitimacy by stamping the authority of the state is part of
a mistaken belief that compliance equals legitimacy.
It does not.
Some of it is in the language of /kragdadigheid/that is re-emerging,
faster now in lockdown. Using terms like security or police *force*when
the Constitution talks of security services. Or police talking of law
and order and “stamping the authority of the state” rather than the
Constitution’s safety and security.
Some of it is dangerous, disrespectful posturing.
“You’re not our clients. We are not the police. We take instructions
from the commander-in-chief [President Cyril Ramaphosa],” SANDF Chief of
Staff Lieutenant-General Lindile Yam told Parliament’s Joint Standing
Committee of Defence on 22 April. His comments stand against Section
198(d) of the Constitution that gives Parliament, alongside the national
executive, authority over national security.
Yam also said “the state is an instrument of government to ensure law
and order is enforced”, in a clear disjunct from the Constitution’s
preamble that talks of laying “the foundation for a democratic and open
society in which government is based on the will of the people and every
citizen is equally protected by law…”.
Similarly disjointed is the SAPS talk of “stamping the authority of the
state”, which runs through its 2020 annual performance plan and
longer-term strategic plan.
Stamping the authority of the state is inherently a forceful act. It
does not easily, if at all, tally with the principles of national
security outlined in Section 198 of the Constitution that it must
“reflect the resolve of South Africans, as individuals and as a nation,
to live as equals, to live in peace and harmony, to be free from fear
and want and to seek a better life”.
If stamping of the authority of the state is a desired SAPS performance
outcome it indicates a loss of legitimacy. Seeking to restore legitimacy
by stamping the authority of the state is part of a mistaken belief that
compliance equals legitimacy.
It does not.
Democracy is messy. Throw into the mix South Africans being /tjatjarag/,
and it’s even messier, while also full of potential. Then add the
pressure of an aspirational Constitution that centres on dignity, a
democratic open society based on social justice and human rights.
None of this is to the liking of those, who on the back of an inept
public administration, are enamoured with shows of force and quick
shortcuts and those who like linear, preferably top-down processes.
The Covid-19 State of Disaster seems to have bolstered those with a
predilection for ministerial decree and edict away from the messy task
of accountability and public consultations, but shored up by
/kragdadige/security forces.
And so democratic South Africa ended up under a curfew, and with police
having the power to determine whether it’s possible to move house within
the month time-frame set by ministerial decree.
How much more space and powers securocrats are allowed to get – in
Cabinet, or in society across /dorpies/, villages or cities – will
ultimately determine the future of our constitutional democracy.
South Africa: Be Aware and Beware of The Rise of the Securocrats. *DM*
***
SA’s testing strategy for Covid-19 is not practical, say top scientists
BL PREMIUM
14 May 2020 - 00:15 TAMAR KAHN
Health workers hard at work in Stjwetla in Alexandra, Johannesburg,
testing people in the area where a man tested positive for coronavirus
and did not isolate himself. Picture: THULANI MBELE
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/8td_1PTvzEHvm4eAcFsL34XPBqVc-bRY7PbQ3OJQtZetZ990YipxaoQ_4UcpE2OB5B3kQ3-sQimmAngaah-D1VBrIO2qJzh4WA=s1200>
Health workers hard at work in Stjwetla in Alexandra, Johannesburg,
testing people in the area where a man tested positive for coronavirus
and did not isolate himself. Picture: THULANI MBELE
Two leading scientists advising the government on Covid-19 have called
for a change in its testing strategy, arguing the extensive delays at
the state laboratory mean community screening and testing is no longer
appropriate in high prevalence areas.
Shabir Madhi and Marc Mendelson are instead proposing that SA’s limited
tests and laboratory resources be conserved for patients who are
hospitalised, health-care workers, and people living in old-age homes.
Madhi is head of the Medical Research Council’s respiratory and
meningeal pathogens unit and chairs the government’s Covid-19 advisory
committees on public health. Mendelson is head of infectious diseases at
the University of Cape Town and chairs the advisory committee on clinicians.
Last week the Western Cape health department said it had been forced to
turn to private laboratories because the National Health Laboratory
Service (NHLS) could not cope with demand and was taking up to a week to
provide test results.
Long turn-around times for test results hamper the management of
critically ill patients in hospital, and hobble attempts to trace
contacts and contain the disease.
There is a backlog of 11,000 tests at the NHLS laboratory in Green
Point, according to Western Cape spokesperson Bianca Capazorio. Business
Day understands there are similar backlogs in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal.
Western Cape has the largest reported number of Covid-19 cases in SA,
and by Tuesday had a little more than 6,760 of the national tally of
12,074. The densely populated city of Cape Town has been hit hard, but
so too have other metros such eThekwini and Buffalo City.
“The inability of community screening to achieve its goal due to the
prolonged testing turnaround time leaves us with a broken system in high
prevalence areas such as the Cape Town metro and other predominately
metro areas of the country.
“We believe wholesale change is needed,” wrote Madhi and Mendelson in an
editorial in the latest edition of the SA Medical Journal.
In high prevalence areas, it is no longer practical to track down and
test every contact of an infected person, nor will doing so influence
the trajectory of the epidemic because it is past the point of
containment, they wrote.
They propose that community health workers continue screening but stop
referring people who are not critically ill for laboratory testing.
Those tests, which detect the presence of the Sars-Cov-2 virus, should
be reserved for the people for whom a result would make a significant
difference, such as healthcare workers and their close contacts, they said.
Capazorio said the Western Cape was testing as strategically as
possible, given the NHLS backlogs, with a focus on healthcare workers
and vulnerable groups, particularly in “hotspot” areas. It did not
intend to change its strategy at this stage, she said.
“Testing is a key component of any government's approach to fighting
Covid-19, and it is critical that the backlogs and shortages are sorted
out as quickly as possible. It is for this reason that we have raised
this issue at the highest level,” she said. Western Cape premier Alan
Winde wrote to President Cyril Ramaphosa flagging the problems at the
NHLS last week.
/kahnt at businesslive.co.za <mailto:kahnt at businesslive.co.za>/
***
City removes occupiers from land earmarked for housing
13 May 2020 By Buziwe Nocuze <https://www.groundup.org.za/author/164/>
“Where are we supposed to get the money to pay rent?”
<https://www.groundup.org.za/media/uploads/images/photographers/Buziwe%20Nocuze/khayelitsha%20eviction%202020.JPG>
Some residents from Nyakathisa informal settlements in Khayelitsha, Cape
Town attempted to occupy land next to the settlement but were stopped by
the City’s Anti-Land Invasion Unit at the weekend. Photo: Buziwe Nocuze
“Where are we supposed to get the money to pay rent? The only solution
we had was to invade this space,” says Chuma Funda from Nyakathisa
informal settlement in Khayelitsha, Cape Town.
The 38-year-old was among a group of residents whose attempt to occupy
land next to the settlement was stopped by the City’s Anti-Land Invasion
Unit at the weekend.
Funda says some of the people began building homes on the land had been
chased away by their landlords because they could no longer afford to
pay rent.
“All we want is for the City to bring back our material. Most of us are
not working. Taking our material is evil because we don’t have money to
buy more,” she says.
Another resident Mongezi Funda says: “Our belongings were damaged. How
are we supposed to get money to buy other things because the lockdown is
making things difficult for all of us. They must bring back our material.”
Community leader, Siyanda Nodada says most families living in Nyakathisa
have been there for more than ten years. They were promised that the
vacant space would be used to build them houses, she says. “We decided
to use the open space because we don’t have money to rent and we have
been waiting to get houses for too long. The councillor promised us that
by 2020 we will be staying in our houses.”
“We were told that our councillor sold us out and contacted the City
informing them about what we were doing. That alone shows that he lied
to us about getting houses soon,” says Nodada.
Ward councillor Zwelijikile Simbeku confirmed that he had informed the
City about the occupation as the land has been earmarked to build houses
for backyarders from the area.
“It is my duty to report such things. If I had let them build their
shacks, what was going to happen to the backyarders who know the space
is reserved to build their houses?”
Simbeku said he would accompany community leaders to speak to the
landlords where residents are unable to pay rent during the lockdown.
Mayco Member for Human Settlements, Malusi Booi said the City’s
Anti-Land invasion Unit only removed unoccupied and incomplete
structures in line with the law and based on advice from legal
professionals. “The City will continue to remove unoccupied and illegal
structures to prevent the illegal occupation of land. When land is
invaded or when attempts are made to occupy land, we move backward
rather than forward,” he said.
“This is especially important in light of the enormous increase in land
invasions across the metro over the past months. Numerous newly
established communities are demanding services but currently the City is
unable to cater for these unplanned settlements as existing recognised
informal settlements are prioritised based on available resources,” said
Booi.
***
Applicants for grants sleep outside SASSA offices
12 May 2020 By Buziwe Nocuze <https://www.groundup.org.za/author/164/>
“We do not have any other choice but to wait”
Photo of queue of people
<https://www.groundup.org.za/media/uploads/images/photographers/Buziwe%20Nocuze/SASSAKhayelitsha-BuziweNocuze-20200512%201.jpg>
Applicants for social grants queued outside the SASSA offices in
Khayelitsha on Monday. Some had spent the night there. Photo: Buziwe Nocuze
On Sunday night, residents of Khayelitsha in Cape Town slept outside the
offices of the SA Social Security Agency (SASSA) which were reopened on
Monday after a six-week closure.
All those who spent the night on the pavement were assisted and given
appointments for Friday, said SASSA spokesperson Shivan Wahab.
Nokwanela Vamela, 66, was there because his pension payments had stopped
and he wanted to know why. “It is better to sleep here than coming in
the morning. Everyone has been waiting for the offices to open and we
have a lot of problems’, said Vamela. He said people had brought
blankets and mattresses to prepare for the cold night on the concrete.
“We slept on the concrete so that we get assisted first when they open
the offices.”
Nosibusiso Mdlankomo came to find out why her child’s grant had no been
paid last month. She has been depending on her neighbours for help. “I
can’t keep on asking food from other people because everyone is
struggling, the lockdown has affected everyone, that’s why I decided to
come and sleep here thinking that I will get in first”.
“But the queue is long, I don’t know if I am going to get a chance to
get in,” said Mdlankomo.
Nomalungisa Duka said she was there to submit documents from the doctor
confirming her disability.
Lindekile Mbita spent the night outside thinking that he would get
assisted first. “But now it is 12:30, and I haven’t been assisted. This
is frustrating, but we do not have any other choice but to wait”.
The offices had been closed since 26 March. Wahab said in line with the
directive on the easing of Lockdown Regulations to Level 4, a phased-in
approach to opening the office had been adopted and staff were working
on a rotational basis.
Wahab said SASSA was dealing with applications for different grants on
different days to avoid a high influx of clients at any contact point.
“Monday and Tuesdays will be Old Age Grant applications, Wednesday Child
Support Grant, and on Friday it will be Disability Grant applications on
an appointment basis”.
In cases where a temporary disability grant is suspended, Wahab said the
grant would be reinstated and paid till October 2020. “The same applies
to Care Dependency and Foster Child Grants that are due to lapse during
the lockdown. The reinstated social grants will be paid before the end
of May 2020.”
“Clients who slept over outside the Khayelitsha Local Office were all
assisted and provided with appointments for Friday, 15 May 2020. These
clients were advised on the peril of sleeping over at any contact point
for services,” said Wahab.
***
Hundreds of social grant applicants turned away in East London
13 May 2020 By Johnnie Isaac <https://www.groundup.org.za/author/460/>
Scuffles break out as desperate people try to get to the front of
the queue
<https://www.groundup.org.za/media/uploads/images/photographers/Johnnie%20Isaac/SASSAqueue-JohnnieIsaac-202005130.jpeg>
Only mothers with newborn babies were served at the SASSA offices in
East London on Wednesday. Hundreds of other applicants for grants were
turned away Photo: Johnnie Isaac
Hundreds of applicants for social grants were turned away from South
African Social Security Agency (SASSA) offices in East London on Wednesday.
Desperate applicants risked Covid-19 infection by not observing social
distancing and pushing to be as close as possible to the front of the
queue. The offices opened this week after being closed for the early
phase of the lockdown.
Some applicants said they had arrived as early as 2am but had found
people already waiting.
When SASSA staff arrived and tried to organise the applicants into
queues and encourage social distancing, there were scuffles.
Applicants said that after GroundUp left, police had been called in and
had arrived with army back-up to rearrange queues and enforce distancing.
The crowd was addressed by SASSA employees who told them that only
babies born this year would be registered for social grants. Fifty
mothers of newborn babies were taken in to register, and other mothers
of newborn babies were given tickets for later appointments.
Applicants who had come for other reasons were turned away and told by
SASSA officials to use the call centre and WhatsApp number.
Nontsikelelo Nocanda told GroundUp it would be impossible for SASSA to
register all applicants with the current system.
“We were hoping that when SASSA reopened its offices they would do what
they used to do previously and deploy officials to conduct applications
in the wards of the applicants, because since Covid-19 lockdown there
has been an increase of people who need SASSA services,” said Nocanda.
Another disappointed applicant, Celia Jongiwe, said she had been trying
to register her sister’s child after she was told that someone else had
been receiving a grant in the child’s name in Cape Town. “I was told to
bring police affidavits and a letter from the social workers but now I’m
being turned away. I have nothing and have been trying to do this before
we were locked down,” said Jongiwe.
Yolanda Guwe, mother of a three-month-old baby, said she had been given
a ticket to return on Thursday. “I feel much better because I won’t be
queuing for nothing.”
SASSA Eastern Cape Spokesperson Luzuko Qina said the agency was using
only one third of its workforce due to lockdown restrictions.
He said SASSA local offices would provide services to “a limited number”
of pension applicants on Mondays and Tuesdays, and to Child Support and
Foster Care grant applicants on Wednesdays and Thursdays.
“On Fridays we serve those whom we were not able to serve on the days
above.”
***
Coronavirus #Lockdown agony
Hunger and desperation rip through the Karoo
By Estelle Ellis• 13 May 2020
As lockdown hunger stalks the Karoo, humanitarian teams encounter
heartbreaking stories.
A young mom, carrying her baby on her back and holding her little boy by
the hand, walked 55km from Aberdeen to Graaff-Reinet to sell her clothes
so she could buy food. The woman and her children were found on the side
of the road by a team from Gift of the Givers as the trio were looking
for a sheltered place to sleep for the night after their effort was
unsuccessful.
“We were on our way home from delivering food when we saw them,”Gift of
the Givers <https://giftofthegivers.org/>’ Graaff-Reinet team leader,
Corene Conradie, said.
“They were already soaking wet. She said they were coming from
Graaff-Reinet and they were going home. She had walked there with them.
She was selling clothes to get money for food but the people didn’t pay
her. She was there without anything. They were walking the 55km back home.
Display Adverts
“We gave her everything we could: food, clothes, blankets,” Conradie
said. “We gave them a lift.”
Before lockdown regulations halted work in the hospitality industry and
the casual labour and domestic work markets, many Karoo residents were
already battling poverty. The lockdown made the situation desperate.
Lockdown was announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa after he declared
the outbreak of coronavirus infections in the country to be a National
Disaster. As part of the intervention, social grants were temporarily
increased by a few hundred rand a month and a special temporary grant
for unemployed people, of R350, was introduced. Payment of the R350
grant will only start in mid-May.
Conradie said she was constantly heartbroken by the levels of
desperation that they were encountering during their humanitarian relief
efforts.
“The other day I was talking to a woman who came for a food parcel. She
was telling me how she was leaving her children alone every day to go to
the tip. It is the only place where they can still find food. She
couldn’t bear leaving the children without food any longer.
“Another lady, who was from Somalia, said she had to close her shop
because of lockdown. On that day they had not eaten for three days. She
said every morning she and the kids must decide when they are eating on
the day because they only have enough for one meal. There is no help for
foreigners.
“There are a lot of domestic workers, casual workers, waitresses and
people who worked in guesthouses who now have no money left. Guesthouse
owners have exhausted their savings trying to look after their staff.
Display Adverts
“This morning I had a call from a school for help. The principal said
that parents are overwhelming him with requests for food.
“Every day we are receiving calls for help from as far as East London.
Most people ask for a bread or just for R20 so they can buy bread. My
heart is constantly breaking,” she said.
“This morning I have put in another order for R32,000 in food from Gift
of the Givers. It is a lot for us, but people need to eat.”
Conradie said she is often moved to tears when they deliver food to
eight soup kitchens in the Graaff-Reinet area.
“Children will wait all morning with their bowls and when they see the
bakkie they run. Even old people, they try to run with their bowl to
make it to the line. We have taken their addresses now. We said to the
aunties that they mustn’t run. I think how I will feel if it was my mom
or my grandmother. I tell them we will bring food to their house. It
breaks something in you when you see an old person grab their bowl and
run for a bakkie.”
Eldrige Ruiters, a councillor in Aberdeen, said there are places of
extreme poverty in the Karoo, a region that has largely been overlooked
by government’s food response to the pandemic.
“There are a few stakeholders bringing relief food parcels, and the
extra grant money also helped a bit. But there is still a great need
among households whose income is between nought to R500 per month,” he
said.
Display Adverts
“The secrecy around food parcels beneficiaries and the strict
regulations of private persons and organisations, who are trying to
help, doesn’t assist the situation.
“There are many areas that are being overlooked. These include Rietbron,
Nieu-Bethesda and Klipplaat.
“I think about 30% of the people in the Karoo no longer know where their
next meal will come from. Further restrictions on casual and domestic
work, the hunting season and fence maintenance teams, who mostly work on
contract, can see this percentage increase to 45%,” he said.
“Many of these people work but they are not registered with the
Unemployment Insurance Fund.”
Ruiters said it was particularly worrying that so many children were
battling to access food.
Riana van der Ahee from Vuyani Safe Haven in Graaff-Reinet said they
were part of an initiative to distribute 13 tons of food in the town and
to surrounding towns.
“We have often received food for the children’s home from theKFC Add
Hope <https://order.kfc.co.za/addhope>Fund. They phoned to ask if they
can help,” she said.
Display Adverts
She said a Covid-19 relief committee run by civil society, local
government, provincial government and the churches had been established
to coordinate relief efforts in Graaff-Reinet.
“The food was dropped off late one night and we packed food parcels with
maize, porridge, tinned food and oil. It is enough food for a week for a
family of four,” she said.
“We know the food doesn’t go far but we have discovered that the two
weeks before grants are paid are when families are struggling the most.
We are hoping that with the grant increases this situation will improve
a little,” she said.
“Almost everywhere in this town and other towns there are informal
workers. They will come sweep for you or help out for a little extra
money. With lockdown, none of them could work.”
She said she was impressed by cooperation from government departments,
the police and civil society to distribute food.
“We have social workers who go into the homes first to check if people
really need a food parcel or if they are going to sell it,” she said.
She said as social workers moved through the communities they found
several children who had been badly neglected and these children were
removed.
“This whole operation just showed us where extreme need existed all
along,” she said.
“It really lifted my spirits to see how people were working with each
other. One guy, a professional hunter, came to us and said he wasn’t
able to work [and asked] if he can help with food delivery. You could
see that he developed a deep caring spirit for this community.
“It was also heartening to see that people were not embarrassed to come
and ask for help.
“There is a lot of love here.” *DM/MC*
*****
Prison riot in Lusikisiki
12 May 2020 By Sibahle Siqathule <https://www.groundup.org.za/author/416/>
Awaiting trial inmates say their “rights are grossly violated” by
the Covid-19 lockdown regulations
<https://www.groundup.org.za/media/uploads/images/photographers/Sibahle%20Siqathule/Lusikisiki%20prison.jpeg>
According to an official at Lusikisiki Correctional Centre, who wished
to stay anonymous, a riot broke out on Thursday when awaiting trial
prisoners demanded to be taken to court. Photo: Sibahle Siqathule
According to an official at Lusikisiki Correctional Centre, who wished
to stay anonymous, a riot broke out on Thursday when awaiting trial
prisoners demanded to be taken to court.
The official told GroundUp that 20 inmates were acting “aggressively”
and started throwing mattresses out of their cells.
The official said the situation at the prison has been tense. A
handwritten letter, listing 24 inmates and addressed to the Lusikisiki
Correctional Centre, said that on 20 and 21 April, awaiting trial
inmates had engaged in a “hunger strike”.
In the letter they wrote that their “rights are grossly violated” by the
lockdown measures, which have seen prison visits prohibited and
prisoners not being sent to court on their court dates. They also fear
contracting Covid-19 “in this dirty jail” from the wardens.
They alleged that wardens took away their 20-litre water containers,
their only source of drinking water, in order to break the “hunger strike”.
GroundUp spoke to Department of Correctional Services spokesperson
Singabakho Nxumalo on 5 May, before the Thursday incident. He confirmed
that the department was aware of the tensions at Lusikisiki Correctional
Centre.
“A total of 48 remand detainees did not take their meals on 20 April
2020, but they took breakfast on 21 April 2020. As a result, such cannot
be described as a hunger strike.
“Inmates were not forced to suspend hunger strike, but were engaged and
they understood that their demands were beyond what Correctional
Services could do,” said Nxumalo.
“Only urgent matters are being enrolled by courts. It was explained to
them [prisoners] that they are remanded for later dates due to lockdown
due to Covid-19,” said Nxumalo.
Nxumalo tried to allay the fears of both inmates and prison officials,
saying procedures were in place to safeguard everyone.
“Standard Operating Procedures on Covid-19 are in place and our
officials fully understand what is expected of them. Hence inmates are
also engaged in order to heighten their understanding of Covid-19,” said
Nxumalo.
Two days after these assurances there was a riot. GroundUp was unable to
get official confirmation from the facility of the incident at the time
of publication.
***
“One day I will get my own food parcel”
12 May 2020 By Thamsanqa Mbovane <https://www.groundup.org.za/author/361/>
Hungry KwaNobuhle residents wait all night for food
For the past three weeks, dozens of residents of KwaNobuhle, Uitenhage,
have been sleeping next to Solomon Mahlangu High School, hoping to be
the first people in the queue for food parcels the next day.
The residents, from wards 42 to 47, are waiting for food parcels from
Vukuzakhe Project, a non-profit organisation from the township. As part
of Covid-19 relief, Vukuzakhe is distributing 1,118 food parcels
supplied by Food Forward, an organisation which collects surplus food
from the consumer goods supply chain and distributes it to community
organisations that serve the poor.
Vukuzakhe member Nonkosinathi Buzani told GroundUp: “People keep
sleeping next to the school and make fires, sit on chairs and talk the
whole night, so that they get the free food the next day.”
“But our neighbours are complaining. We tell these people to go… but
they don’t want to sleep at home, ” she said.
Her organisation of nine people used to keep the fresh food on the
school premises, and hand it out to people in queues. But when large
numbers of people started coming and social distancing rules were
difficult to apply, Vukuzakhe decided to distribute the food parcels
door-to-door.
“But people kept sleeping next to the fence of Solomon Mahlangu High,”
said Buzani.
“When we address them, telling them that we no longer distribute food,
people won’t listen. They hurl insults at us, saying we want to eat all
the food parcels by ourselves.”
“They also say we should not worry about them sleeping in the cold and
that our job is to give them food, for free, and we should mind our own
business.”
KwaNobuhle residents queuing for food parcels. Photo: Thamsanqa Mbovane
KwaNobuhle resident Mbuzeli Bam, 29, said: “I am unemployed and I will
keep sleeping next to the school because I did not get a food parcel
yet. People wake up and queue before I do…and I see some getting food
every day.”
“One day I will get my own food parcel,” he said.
Another resident, Simphiwe Dondashe, said: “Food is what we all need and
we can’t help but to be near where it is … at the school. We see it and
we want it, and we will get it.”
Buzani appealed to residents to adhere to lockdown regulations by
staying at home.
***
Coronavirus Op-Ed
We all lose when we exclude refugees, asylum seekers and migrants
By Adam Andani• 14 May 2020
A group of refugees living on the pavement near the Cape Town Central
police station.( Photo: Nardus Engelbrecht / Gallo Images) Less
As Covid-19 diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics become available,
we must ensure equal, and affordable access for not only citizens,
but for everyone in South Africa, including refugees, asylum seekers
and migrants (irrespective of legal status and documentation).
One hard truth about Covid-19 is that it knows no borders. For this
reason, government’s approach to tackling the pandemic must be
all-inclusive and non-discriminatory, especially in the context of
deepening unemployment, cyclical poverty as well as the racial and
economic inequalities that exist in our society.
Besides this moral obligation, South Africa has a legal mandate under
Section27 of the Constitution to enforce equal access to healthcare
services for all. Moreover, the ratification
<https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1662-media-statement-the-united-nations-committee-on-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-issues-recommendations-to-south-africa>of
the United Nations Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(ICESCR) on 12 October 2018 implies that all migrants, refugees and
asylum seekers (documented and undocumented), shall be ensured their
rights in full.
As a host country, the government has a duty to provide access to
essential health and social protection services for refugees, asylum
seekers and migrants (and their children), through the current Covid-19
response and economic recovery programmes.
In our quest to contain the virus and combat the associated
socio-economic impacts, particularly on vulnerable communities, we
should not forget that refugees, asylum seekers and migrants living in
South African host communities and shelters (camps) face a heightened
risk
<https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/20/you-cant-do-social-distancing-if-youre-a-refugee/>.
It is difficult to practice physical distancing, for example, when you
live in a crowded refugee camp, prison, or a detention centre. An
outbreak of any respiratory disease, like the current Covid-19 pandemic,
could gain a foothold in overcrowded confines and unsafe conditions that
epitomise many informal settlements in which the majority of the poor,
including migrants, reside.
The vulnerability of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants is further
exacerbated by existing socio-cultural, economic, political and legal
barriers <https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259486>. These are
characterised by limited access to (and awareness of their rights),
healthcare and preventative services such as handwashing and sanitation
facilities.
In addition, water scarcity, especially in informal settlements,
continues to be a growing concern, making people in these sites more
prone to exposure and less resilient to fight off the virus. Even in
instances where some migrant groups have access to healthcare services,
they tend to avoid them due to fear of deportation as well as xenophobic
and discriminatory attitudes in host communities. Ample evidence
suggests that social stigmatisation
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000263>and anxieties generated by
restrictive immigration policies undermine migrants’ access to health
rights while minimising their sense of entitlement to such rights.
In his 21 April 2020 address to the nation, President Cyril Ramaphosa
announced a massive social relief and economic support package of
R500-billion (10% of GDP), to stabilise the economy and address the
socio-economic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. Yet his plan is not
explicit on how it will address the needs of refugees, asylum seekers,
and migrants.
Even though pandemic preparedness plans
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039731/> across Africa
are inadequate in addressing the complex needs of refugees, asylum
seekers and migrants during pandemics, South Africa needs to adopt a
holistic approach that prioritises the health needs of this population
group in the current Covid-19 containment measures and economic stimulus
plan.
If we limit access to essential Covid-19 services (testing, treatment
and personal protective equipment), for refugees, asylum seekers and
migrants, we do so at our peril. We run the risk of jeopardising our
limited resources and the efforts that have been committed so far to
flatten the curve of infections. This could lead to a new chain of
infections in migrant communities after the lockdown is lifted as the
virus will spread from shelters to host communities. *DM/MC*
**/Adam Andani/ /is a senior programme officer at the Open Society
Foundation for South Africa. He writes in his personal capacity./
/***/
/NewFrame/
Migrants excluded from government food aid
All around South Africa, migrants, refugees and asylum seekers who have
mostly been left out of the government’s official response to the food
crisis are going hungry.
*
By: Jan Bornman <https://www.newframe.com/writer/jan-bornman/>
@jwbornman_ <http://twitter.com/jwbornman_>
*
Photographer: James Oatway
<https://www.newframe.com/photographer/james-oatway/>
@jamesoatway <http://instagram.com/jamesoatway>
13 May 2020
* News <https://www.newframe.com/category/news/>
30 April 2020: Alice Munyanyiwa is visually impaired and the Covid-19
lockdown has denied her the little money she usually earns begging on
the streets of Johannesburg.
For Alice Munyanyiwa, a cup of tea has become a luxury she can barely
afford.
When she travelled to South Africa from Zimbabwe at the behest of her
father-in-law in May last year, the 25-year-old thought she would be
able to build a better life. But she’s struggled to find work in
Johannesburg because of a visual impairment.
Munyanyiwa rents a room in a derelict building in Doornfontein. There
she found a community of other migrants, many of them also living with
disabilities. Residents share one tap and the only toilets they have
access to are public ones across the street that are locked at night.
Recently, the electricity has been cut off at the building.
The residents relied on the little money they earned while begging on
the streets of Johannesburg. But for the past seven weeks this community
has seen the little income they earned dry up, making it nearly
impossible to buy food. As the three-week hard lockdown turned into five
weeks, Munyanyiwa and the other migrants were confined to their small,
dark rooms.
Even as the lockdown eased into level four, opportunities to earn money
through begging in Johannesburg did not return.
“We are struggling with food and clothes. Winter is coming, and we don’t
have any clothes,” she says. “We are just going hungry and struggling. I
still have some mielie meal, but we don’t get any nutritious food like
fruit or veggies.”
Related article:
* <https://www.newframe.com/hunger-gnawing-at-the-edges-of-the-world/>
Hunger gnawing at the edges of the world
<https://www.newframe.com/hunger-gnawing-at-the-edges-of-the-world/>
John Zindandi, 38, is blind and has been living in the building since
2010. He moved there after living in the Central Methodist Church in the
Johannesburg CBD after the 2008 xenophobic attacks.
“I normally survive through begging. These days are tough, man. We’re
not allowed to move around. It’s very tough. We don’t have anything, and
we don’t have anybody helping us,” he says. “We are very hungry. In this
building, we have over 50 people who are blind. We have nobody caring
for us. We are just hearing that people are getting help in other places
like Yeoville.”
Like Munyanyiwa, Zindandi says he has mostly been eating once a day.
30 April 2020: Zimbabwean John Zindandi is blind and lives in the same
derelict building as Alice Munyanyiwa. The lockdown has prevented him
from begging for money to buy food.
*Excluding migrants*
Munyanyiwa and Zindandi are just two of the millions of people in South
Africa who have seen their incomes all but disappear during the
lockdown, making it harder to buy food. But, as migrants, they have been
excluded from the government’s food relief programmes.
Munyanyiwa says she has no idea where to even apply for any relief and
has been relying on the generosity of a few strangers who have helped her.
In a joint statement, the Centre for Human Rights at the University of
Pretoria and the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at Wits University
expressed their concerns about the exclusion of migrants, refugees and
asylum seekers in the government’s coronavirus relief schemes.
The legal centres said they were worried about the government’s
insistence that applicants for food aid need ID numbers and that
citizens are prioritised. “We reaffirm that this is not a time to
exclude certain populations within society, neither is it a time to
reinforce negative attitudes against non-nationals,” the statement says.
Tshepo Madlingozi, director of the Centre for Applied Legal Studies,
says: “It is important that the government understands that this is not
a time to encourage or perpetuate any form of intolerance. Neither will
there ever be a time to do so. As such, the government, through the
Department of Home Affairs, should explicitly give directions for the
protection of asylum seekers in this period.”
Related article:
* <https://www.newframe.com/covid-19-just-the-latest-excuse-for-british-racism/>
Covid-19 just the latest excuse for British racism
<https://www.newframe.com/covid-19-just-the-latest-excuse-for-british-racism/>
In a letter to the presidency and a number of government departments,
Thifulufheli Sinthumule, the director of the Consortium for Refugees and
Migrants in South Africa (Cormsa), says the pandemic and the lockdown
has exposed historic inequality and levels of poverty in South Africa.
“Without doubt, the lockdown has impacted and disadvantaged all people
living in South Africa, irrespective of one’s nationality or current
documentation status in the country. One thing we know is that Covid-19
does not discriminate and neither should the government’s response to
alleviate and address its social and economic consequences,” Sinthumule
writes.
The Scalabrini Centre of Cape Town warns that excluding documented and
undocumented migrants from food relief may open them up to further
exploitation and place them at risk of attempting to unlawfully cross
the border to return to their countries of origin.
There have been reports of migrant communities nearing starvation
elsewhere in South Africa. /Health-E News/ reported
<https://health-e.org.za/2020/05/01/lockdownsa-most-of-us-have-run-out-of-food/>
that about 600 Zimbabweans living near Louis Trichardt in Limpopo had
run out of food because they were unable to earn a living.
Joseph Maposa, a representative of the Zimbabwean community, told
/Health-E News/: “We are so many [Zimbabweans] here and most of us were
surviving through part-time jobs such as being house maids, selling
various items on the streets, running salons and barber shops, and
construction work but due to the lockdown, which we also support,
everything has stopped and most of us have run out of food.”
Related article:
* <https://www.newframe.com/episode-10-hunger-and-covid-19-brazils-bolsonaro-virus/>
Episode 10: Hunger and Covid-19 | Brazil’s Bolsonaro virus
<https://www.newframe.com/episode-10-hunger-and-covid-19-brazils-bolsonaro-virus/>
In Zeerust in the North West, Congolese Solidarity Campaign
representative Shauri Jonathan Mwenemwitu says Congolese migrants and
refugees in the small town are helpless as hunger sets in. “It is very
hard. We have no income and no food. It is very hard. Now we are facing
hunger, and we don’t have any help.”
Acting MEC for Social Development in Gauteng Panyaza Lesufi says
<https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/foreign-nationals-feel-excluded-by-sa-government-from-receiving-social-relief-grant/>
the department is not discriminating against migrants, refugees and
asylum seekers when it insists on people needing to be documented.
“Our approach is simple. Whoever is appropriately documented to be
inside the country will get support, and if people are not documented to
be in the country, it’s unfortunate. We will request them to deal with
that aspect so that they can be in a queue. We are not discriminating,”
he says.
In a speech on 29 April 2020, Minister of Social Development Lindiwe
Zulu clarified the department’s stance, saying it would be
“intensifying” its “hunger-targeting food and nutrition distribution
programmes” but there was no mention of migrants in these programmes.
Zulu reiterated that refugees qualified for the special Covid-19 social
relief distress grant, but would be required to be registered with home
affairs.
7 May 2020: Malawian Eliza Banda sits in the corridor outside her
sixth-floor apartment in inner-city Johannesburg after being evicted.
Alana Potter, the director of research and advocacy at the
Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri), says it is unlawful,
discriminatory and inhumane to exclude migrants and undocumented
migrants from food relief according to Section 27 (1) (b) of the
Constitution.
“South Africa has a long history of using narrow qualifying criteria and
onerous registration processes (eg housing lists and indigent
registration) as a way to target social benefits,” she says.
“Now that we’re in a crisis, these well-worn methods are the very fault
lines used to distribute food and other forms of relief. Indigent
registration processes required for people to access free basic services
and social grants are onerous, exclusionary and come at high social,
financial and economic cost to the poor.”
*Hunger and evictions*
Malawians Christoph Kenneth, 38, and his wife, Joyce, 29, have both seen
their incomes disappear as they have been unable to go to work for
nearly two months. Joyce, who usually works as a domestic worker, has
been selling tomatoes in the corridor outside the room they rent in a
building in Hillbrow.
She says it’s become increasingly difficult for the family to buy food
and other essentials including nappies for their six-month-old son, Vincent.
“It’s not been easy. It’s been very hard. There are many people selling
tomatoes or other vegetables in the building so I’m not making a lot of
money,” she says.
Kenneth adds: “Life now is very hard. If I get R5, I will try and buy
two nappies. We are just trying to manage.”
5 May 2020: Malawians Christoph and Joyce Kenneth live in a small
apartment in Joburg’s inner city with their baby, Vincent. The lockdown
has affected both their livelihoods.
He says the family went from having three meals every day that included
tea, sugar and fresh vegetables, to mostly surviving on one meal of
mainly pap. “It’s very stressful. I’m lying at night thinking how I’m
going to feed my baby, what I’m going to eat. It is very stressful. You
can’t guarantee anything. We are just hoping this disease can come under
control. We are hoping to do some work soon because I don’t know how I’m
going to survive,” he says.
Kenneth says they used to send money back home to family in Malawi, but
that’s mostly stopped. They have already spent the little savings the
family had on food. “They are saying everyone, even those who are
undocumented [can register for food aid]. I want to register but I don’t
know where to go or how to do it. If someone can just tell us,” he says.
While Kenneth and his wife have been lucky to negotiate rent payments
with their landlord, other migrants have been forced out of their homes
despite a nationwide moratorium on evictions.
Related article:
* <https://www.newframe.com/lockdown-means-eviction-for-many-backyard-dwellers/>
Lockdown means ‘eviction’ for many back-yard dwellers
<https://www.newframe.com/lockdown-means-eviction-for-many-backyard-dwellers/>
Last week, Mohammed Foster, 26, and his wife, Jane Afia, 19, who is
eight-months pregnant, were evicted from their apartment in the
Johannesburg CBD along with the other people in the apartment.
“There is nowhere for us to go. We can’t find a new place now in
lockdown. Where are we going to sleep? My wife is pregnant. I don’t know
what to do,” Foster says. “We can’t sleep outside. Maybe we will go to
the police station and find a place to sleep there. This is a big
problem. I am very stressed. I don’t know what I’m going to do.”
The young family eventually found a place to sleep with friends in
Germiston, east of Johannesburg, while the other people who shared the
apartment had to make their own arrangements.
The caretaker of the building, who didn’t want to give his name, says
the owners of the building told him to evict Foster and the other people
in the apartment after they failed to pay rent. He concedes it “wasn’t
fair or right” but insists that Foster and the other people who shared
that apartment were warned.
//
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openspaceforum.net/pipermail/wsm-discuss/attachments/20200514/70775b97/attachment.htm>
More information about the WSM-Discuss
mailing list