[WSMDiscuss] Ecuador: Historic urban vote against large scale mining in referendum
quincysaul at protonmail.com
Tue Feb 9 09:06:30 CET 2021
Dear Jai and other friends,
I look forward to the details about what exactly happened in Cuenca; is a vote for Yaku considered a referendum against mining, or was there something on the ballot for the presidential election which specifically addresses a referendum on mining?
I think it is important for a few other perspectives on this election be shared with this list, which until now has only posted articles in english supporting the campaign of Yaku. At the least it should be acknolwedged that there is considerable debate and controversy about his character and campaign from every sector, including his own party, and there are many outspoken indigenous, urban and international voices which we should at least be aware of. Here are a few links in spanish and english:
Revolutionary Reflections | Anti-extractivism and radical politics in Ecuador
How Ecuador’s US-backed, coup-supporting ‘ecosocialist’ candidate Yaku Pérez aids the right-wing
Pérez y Lasso: las derechas del greenwashing y la oligarquía
Yaku es Lasso: las dos caras de la derecha para mantenerse en el poder
Ecuador: la derecha radicalizada
Ecuador: El brazo indígena de la fórmula Arauz-Rabascall
The Left Can Take Back Power in Ecuador
Disparan sobre Arauz
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, February 8, 2021 11:08 PM, Jai Sen <jai.sen at cacim.net> wrote:
> Monday, February 8, 2021
> Saludos Miriam !
> Great news indeed ! Thanks so much for this post, with all its news. My apologies therefore (to you and to all those on this list), for sort of doing a ‘duplicate’ post – though on the elections in Ecuador alone, and not on the wonderful news of the Cuenca referendum – earlier today; I had then not seen yours, that came in last night, along with a whole lot of other posts and mail !
> We now all look forward to more posts from you, on the outcome of the elections ! And, in time, on implementation of the outcome of the Cuenca Referendum.
> In solidarity, and in hope –
>> On Feb 8, 2021, at 6:47 AM, Aplaneta at protonmail.com wrote:
>> great news!!
>> and so quick!!! I cant even find the information in Spanish!!!!
>> a pity is just Cuenca, but great as it is one of the regions with most mining projetc - but I wish i was for the entire country - hope it is the first move and that the whole mining madness stops. I know that the late Gloria Chicaza will be very happy. Hope Mirador is stopped too, and Intag, where i have so many friends.
>> Keep on the struggle!!!
>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Monday, 8 de February de 2021 5:12, Miriam Lang via WSM-Discuss <wsm-discuss at lists.openspaceforum.net> wrote:
>>> Ecuador: Historic urban vote against large scale mining in referendum
>>> Ecuador’s third largest city Cuenca, of more than 600.000 inhabitants, has voted clearly against large-scale mining on February 7th, 2021. According to estimates published on Sunday night, 80% of voters have expressed themselves for water and life, and against mining and extractivism. This referendum has been approved by the Constitutional Court in September 2020, what makes its results binding. While the results of the simultaneous presidential election were still being counted, pointing at a second round in April, the referendum organizers made clear on election night that any new president will have to respect the will of the people of Cuenca. It is the first time in Latin American history that a binding referendum against large-scale mining is won in a big city, and not in a directly affected rural community, according to Argentinian sociologist Maristella Svampa.
>>> In September 2020, the Constitutional Court had given way to the referendum for the protection of the Cuenca water recharge zone with 4200 water bodies in the Andean Highlands, where the five rivers which guarantee the city’s water supply arise. The referendum had been promoted by an alliance of 14 social organizations, the Cabildo del Agua, who first won the approval of the Cuenca City Council and then the Mayor. Corporations from Canada, Australia, Peru, Chile, and other countries hold large or mid-scale mining concessions in this sensitive ecological area, whose exploitation will now be forbidden. For this reason, Ecuador’s mining chamber had argued that the referendum would affect foreign investor’s legal security. According to the mining cadastre, there are 73 concessions in Cuenca county, 43 of which being for metal mining. Two of the mining projects categorized as “strategic” by former governments also fall into the now forbidden zone.
>>> While Ecuador is struck by a severe economic recession in the midst of the pandemic, many presidential candidates have promised large-scale mining would mark the path out of this crisis, alongside with further expanding the oil frontier. Nevertheless, many Ecuadorians are aware that engaging into large-scale industrial mining in one of the Earth’s mega-biodiverse countries in the midst of this era of accelerated biodiversity loss leads into the wrong direction. The overwhelmingly clear result of the Cuenca referendum opens the path to discuss socioecological alternatives which evolve around the preservation of life and the conditions for its reproduction instead of prioritizing the profits of transnational companies and the both socially and environmentally unsustainable export of raw-materials.
>>> In the meantime, with 50% of the records from the presidential election processed, it seems likely that the second round in April will confront Andres Arauz, a close ally of former president Rafael Correa, and Yaku Pérez, the candidate of the indigenous movement party Pachakutik anf former prefect of Cuenca. The right-wing, neoliberal banker Guillermo Lasso would just be in third place. Yet much is still uncertain in this count.
> Jai Sen
> Independent researcher, editor; Senior Fellow at the School of International Development and Globalisation Studies at the University of Ottawa
> jai.sen at cacim.net&mailto:jsen at firstname.lastname@example.org
> Now based in Ottawa, Canada,on unsurrendered Anishinaabe territory(+1-613-282 2900) and in New Delhi, India (+91-98189 11325)
> Check out something new– including for copies of the first two books below, at a discount, and much more :[The Movements of Movements](https://movementsofmovements.net/)
> Jai Sen, ed, 2017 –The Movements of Movements, Part 1 : What Makes Us Move ?. New Delhi : OpenWord and Oakland, CA :PM Press.Ebook and hard copy available at[PM Press](http://www.pmpress.org/);hard copy only also at[The Movements of Movements](https://movementsofmovements.net/)
> Jai Sen, ed, 2018a –The Movements of Movements, Part 2 : Rethinking Our Dance.Ebook and hard copy available at[PM Press](http://www.pmpress.org/);hard copy only also at[The Movements of Movements](https://movementsofmovements.net/)
> Jai Sen, ed, 2018b –The Movements of Movements, Part 1 : What Makes Us Move ?(Indian edition). New Delhi : AuthorsUpfront, in collaboration with OpenWord andPM Press. Hard copy available at[MOM1AmazonIN](https://www.amazon.in/dp/9387280101/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1522884070&sr=8-2&keywords=movements+of+movements+jai+sen),[MOM1Flipkart](https://www.flipkart.com/the-movements-of-movements/p/itmf3zg7h79ecpgj?pid=9789387280106&lid=LSTBOK9789387280106NBA1CH&marketplace=FLIPKART&srno=s_1_1&otracker=search&fm=SEARCH&iid=ff35b702-e6a8-4423-b014-16c84f6f0092.9789387280106.SEARCH&ppt=Search%20Page), and[MOM1AUpFront](http://www.authorsupfront.com/movements.htm)
> SUBSCRIBE TO World Social Movement Discuss,an open, unmoderated, and self-organising forum on social and political movement at any level (local, national, regional, and global).To subscribe, simply send an empty email towsm-discuss-subscribe at lists.openspaceforum.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WSM-Discuss